Electron Band Structure
In Germanium, My Ass
Abstract: The exponential dependence of resistivity on temperature in germanium
is found to be a great big lie. My careful theoretical modeling and painstaking
experimentation reveal 1) that my equipment is crap, as are all the available
texts on the subject and 2) that this whole exercise was a complete waste of my
time.
Introduction
Electrons in germanium are confined to well-defined energy bands that are
separated by "forbidden regions" of zero charge-carrier density. You
can read about it yourself if you want to, although I don't recommend it.
You'll have to wade through an obtuse, convoluted discussion about considering
an arbitrary number of non-coupled harmonic-oscillator potentials and taking
limits and so on. The upshot is that if you heat up a sample of germanium,
electrons will jump from a non-conductive energy band to a conductive one,
thereby creating a measurable change in resistivity. This relation between
temperature and resistivity can be shown to be exponential in certain
temperature regimes by waving your hands and chanting "to first
order".
Experiment
procedure
I sifted through the
box of germanium crystals and chose the one that appeared to be the least
cracked. Then I soldered wires onto the crystal in the spots shown in figure 2b
of Lab Handout 32. Do you have any idea how hard it is to solder wires to
germanium? I'll tell you: real goddamn hard. The solder simply won't stick, and
you can forget about getting any of the grad students in the solid state labs
to help you out.
Once the wires were in place, I attached them as
appropriate to the second-rate equipment I scavenged from the back of the lab,
none of which worked properly. I soon wised up and swiped replacements from the
well-stocked research labs. This is how they treat undergrads around here: they
give you broken tools and then don't understand why you don't get any results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 1: Check this shit
out. |
In order to control
the temperature of the germanium, I attached the crystal to a copper rod, the
upper end of which was attached to a heating coil and the lower end of which
was dipped in a thermos of liquid nitrogen. Midway through the project, the
thermos began leaking. That's right: I pay a cool ten grand a quarter to come
here, and yet they can't spare the five bucks to ensure that I have a working
thermos.
Results
Check this shit out
(Fig. 1). That's bonafide, 100%-real data, my friends. I took it myself over
the course of two weeks. And this was not a leisurely two weeks, either; I
busted my ass day and night in order to provide you with nothing but the best
data possible. Now, let's look a bit more closely at this data, remembering that
it is absolutely first-rate. Do you see the exponential dependence? I sure
don't. I see a bunch of crap.
Christ, this was such a waste of my time.
Banking on my hopes that whoever grades this will just
look at the pictures, I drew an exponential through my noise. I believe the
apparent legitimacy is enhanced by the fact that I used a complicated computer
program to make the fit. I understand this is the same process by which the top
quark was discovered.
Conclusion
Going into physics
was the biggest mistake of my life. I should've declared CS. I still wouldn't
have any women, but at least I'd be rolling in cash.
Stolen from the University of Wisconsin
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~kovar/hall.html